Discussion:
DOMICILIARY CARE DEVELOPMENTS (SCOTLAND) LTD: Proposal to Strike Off
(too old to reply)
Rab C Nesbitt
2005-09-03 07:22:40 UTC
Permalink
From Companies House Web Site (free, public, information available to any
and all of us...)

"
Name & Registered Office:
DOMICILIARY CARE DEVELOPMENTS (SCOTLAND) LTD.
582 GLASGOW ROAD
CLYDEBANK
DUNBARTONSHIRE G81 1NH
Company No. SC219849



Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off


"
I have heard it suggested that the company may provide home care for
disabled children & adults.

Does anyone know where / how to find out what is behind this "Proposal to
Strike Off"???

And, what exactly does this Proposal mean? e.g. is it, perhaps, one agreived
peron who thinks he's owed money, or is it something more serious??

Yours aye

TIA

Rab



begin 666 spacer.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``````````"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
Tone
2005-09-03 08:14:59 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 08:22:40 +0100, "Rab C Nesbitt"
Post by Rab C Nesbitt
From Companies House Web Site (free, public, information available to any
and all of us...)
"
DOMICILIARY CARE DEVELOPMENTS (SCOTLAND) LTD.
582 GLASGOW ROAD
CLYDEBANK
DUNBARTONSHIRE G81 1NH
Company No. SC219849
Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off
"
I have heard it suggested that the company may provide home care for
disabled children & adults.
Does anyone know where / how to find out what is behind this "Proposal to
Strike Off"???
And, what exactly does this Proposal mean? e.g. is it, perhaps, one agreived
peron who thinks he's owed money, or is it something more serious??
Yours aye
TIA
Rab
These pages should help

http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/gbhtml/gbw2.shtml


--


Just livin the Vida Sofa
Dave xxxx
2005-09-03 10:40:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rab C Nesbitt
Does anyone know where / how to find out what is behind this
"Proposal to Strike Off"???
And, what exactly does this Proposal mean? e.g. is it, perhaps, one
agreived peron who thinks he's owed money, or is it something more
serious??
If its money owed I thought that was listed as winding up? strike off
use to be because the company had not filed accounts, even after
warnings. Which ever the reason its coming to an end, if you think its
still trading then give company house a call

The accounts show £2 in the bank lol

and this notice has been actioned by the owners
27/07/2005
GAZ1-652A
FIRST GAZETTE NOTICE FOR VOLUNTARY STRIKE-OFF

23/06/2005
652A
APPLICATION FOR STRIKING-OFF

23/06/2005
288a
SECRETARY APPOINTED

23/06/2005
288b
DIRECTOR RESIGNED

03/06/2005
363s
RETURN MADE UP TO 05/06/05; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

27/04/2005
AA
ACCOUNTS OF DORMANT COMPANY MADE UP TO 30/06/04

01/06/2004
363s
RETURN MADE UP TO 05/06/04; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

31/03/2004
AA
ACCOUNTS OF DORMANT COMPANY MADE UP TO 30/06/03
t***@hotmail.com
2005-09-03 18:14:20 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 10:40:10 GMT, " Dave xxxx"
Post by Dave xxxx
Post by Rab C Nesbitt
Does anyone know where / how to find out what is behind this
"Proposal to Strike Off"???
And, what exactly does this Proposal mean? e.g. is it, perhaps, one
agreived peron who thinks he's owed money, or is it something more
serious??
If its money owed I thought that was listed as winding up? strike off
use to be because the company had not filed accounts, even after
warnings. Which ever the reason its coming to an end, if you think its
still trading then give company house a call
The accounts show £2 in the bank lol
and this notice has been actioned by the owners
27/07/2005
GAZ1-652A
FIRST GAZETTE NOTICE FOR VOLUNTARY STRIKE-OFF
23/06/2005
652A
APPLICATION FOR STRIKING-OFF
23/06/2005
288a
SECRETARY APPOINTED
23/06/2005
288b
DIRECTOR RESIGNED
03/06/2005
363s
RETURN MADE UP TO 05/06/05; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS
27/04/2005
AA
ACCOUNTS OF DORMANT COMPANY MADE UP TO 30/06/04
01/06/2004
363s
RETURN MADE UP TO 05/06/04; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS
31/03/2004
AA
ACCOUNTS OF DORMANT COMPANY MADE UP TO 30/06/03
That puts a different light on the issue. It is a dormant company and
therefore not legally trading if it is trading which I doubt. It is a
legitimate way of protecting a company against default etc but usually
only used by 'iffy' shareholders who are expecting something to go
wrong with their company which could be, for arguments sake something
like Domiciliary Care Development Ltd. That is of course a made up
name but the directors of that company could be hoping to expand and
have a dormant company already made up ready for when they do and it
remains dormant as long as they keep sending in company returns as
such. It should not be trading though.
pete
t***@hotmail.com
2005-09-03 18:19:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@hotmail.com
That puts a different light on the issue. It is a dormant company and
therefore not legally trading if it is trading which I doubt. It is a
legitimate way of protecting a company against default etc but usually
only used by 'iffy' shareholders who are expecting something to go
wrong with their company which could be, for arguments sake something
like Domiciliary Care Development Ltd. That is of course a made up
name but the directors of that company could be hoping to expand and
have a dormant company already made up ready for when they do and it
remains dormant as long as they keep sending in company returns as
such. It should not be trading though.
IO should have added that it may also just be a dormant company
waiting to become a phoenix company which is quite common but not the
sort of company to trust with cash or valuables.
pete
Alhaji Saleh Jambo
2005-09-04 08:19:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@hotmail.com
Post by t***@hotmail.com
That puts a different light on the issue. It is a dormant company and
therefore not legally trading if it is trading which I doubt. It is a
legitimate way of protecting a company against default etc but usually
only used by 'iffy' shareholders who are expecting something to go
wrong with their company which could be, for arguments sake something
like Domiciliary Care Development Ltd. That is of course a made up
name but the directors of that company could be hoping to expand and
have a dormant company already made up ready for when they do and it
remains dormant as long as they keep sending in company returns as
such. It should not be trading though.
IO should have added that it may also just be a dormant company
waiting to become a phoenix company which is quite common but not the
sort of company to trust with cash or valuables.
pete
Peter my friend once again I see you attempting to post on a newsgroup that
despises you for what you are.
You are A Liar and abuser, a troll and a person that gains pleasure from
hurting and harassing others.

Your information is also fatally flawed. in many ways.If you cant give
correct information, simply posting rubish isnt going to help the man

You know nothing.
Now just fade away as no one wants to hear anything from you
Alhaji Saleh Jambo
2005-09-04 08:19:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@hotmail.com
That puts a different light on the issue. It is a dormant company and
therefore not legally trading if it is trading which I doubt. It is a
legitimate way of protecting a company against default etc but usually
only used by 'iffy' shareholders who are expecting something to go
wrong with their company which could be, for arguments sake something
like Domiciliary Care Development Ltd. That is of course a made up
name but the directors of that company could be hoping to expand and
have a dormant company already made up ready for when they do and it
remains dormant as long as they keep sending in company returns as
such. It should not be trading though.
pete
Peter my friend once again I see you attempting to post on a newsgroup that
despises you for what you are.
You are A Liar and abuser, a troll and a person that gains pleasure from
hurting and harassing others.

Your information is also fatally flawed. in many ways.If you cant give
correct information, simply posting rubish isnt going to help the man

You know nothing.
Now just fade away as no one wants to hear anything from you
Dave xxxx
2005-09-03 10:50:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rab C Nesbitt
From Companies House Web Site (free, public, information available
to
any and all of us...)
"
Post by Rab C Nesbitt
And, what exactly does this Proposal mean? e.g. is it, perhaps, one
agreived peron who thinks he's owed money, or is it something more
serious??
Yours aye
TIA
Rab
Sent you copy of accounts
t***@hotmail.com
2005-09-03 18:06:25 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 08:22:40 +0100, "Rab C Nesbitt"
Post by Rab C Nesbitt
From Companies House Web Site (free, public, information available to any
and all of us...)
"
DOMICILIARY CARE DEVELOPMENTS (SCOTLAND) LTD.
582 GLASGOW ROAD
CLYDEBANK
DUNBARTONSHIRE G81 1NH
Company No. SC219849
Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off
"
I have heard it suggested that the company may provide home care for
disabled children & adults.
Does anyone know where / how to find out what is behind this "Proposal to
Strike Off"???
And, what exactly does this Proposal mean? e.g. is it, perhaps, one agreived
peron who thinks he's owed money, or is it something more serious??
It usually means that the company returns have not been made for
sufficiently long to cause concern. If the returns have not been made
because the company secretary and directors have quit it is best to
stay away from that company in it's present form. Very often companies
that go this route open again with a different name but the same
directors etc, known as phoenix companies and very rarely trustworthy.
I have broken two in the last few years locally and in the past, when
I was working I have broken many, including one belonging to Saleh
Jambo although his ownership was disguised behind nominees in the CI's
but I still got it and him.
pete
Alhaji Saleh Jambo
2005-09-04 08:23:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@hotmail.com
It usually means that the company returns have not been made for
sufficiently long to cause concern. If the returns have not been made
because the company secretary and directors have quit it is best to
stay away from that company in it's present form. Very often companies
that go this route open again with a different name but the same
directors etc, known as phoenix companies and very rarely trustworthy.
I have broken two in the last few years locally and in the past, when
I was working I have broken many, including one belonging to Saleh
Jambo although his ownership was disguised behind nominees in the CI's
but I still got it and him.
pete
Peter you have broken no one and once again you are back to your old tricks
of throwing out lies.
You have broken NO companies least of all any of my companies.
Indeed it was your lies abuse and paranoia that got YOU thrown out of Ikeja
when you tried some underhand dealing yourslef and you got caught with your
fingers in the till

You really must learn to stop posting lies as they always will come back to
get you.
Like the lies about your cancer
Like the lies about your colocstomy
like the lies about your diabetes
like the lie about you being married
like the lie about you having a BMW and like the lie abdout you ever doing
anything in Africa other than create havoc and dismay and stealing people
hard earned money

Now go back to your gay groups where you are advertising for men to visit
you

Loading...