Paul Nutteing
2005-10-05 18:59:30 UTC
http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/0,,1584546,00.html
Part Quote
Upping the anti
A new Fathers 4 Justice-style campaign group has launched a series of
bitter attacks on social workers, calling them 'child snatchers' and
family wreckers. David Batty investigates
Read one social worker's reply
Wednesday October 5, 2005
The Guardian
The Daily Mail launched an impassioned broadside on adoption policy
recently - and turned to a tiny, virtually unknown campaign group to
help give credence to its claims that children were being unfairly taken
into care because their parents were too "slow" or too poor. Below the
paper's campaign slogan "Stolen by the State", the group's claims that
councils were being bribed by ministers to arrange more adoptions, and
that this led to children being "snatched" from their birth parents for
spurious reasons, were extensively quoted.
The group is the Families Anti Social Services Inquiry Team (Fassit).
Members share information on the web, and mainly consist of parents
under investigation by social services or in dispute with their
ex-partner over access to their children. But its prominent role in the
Mail's campaign has put wind in its sails. Committed and angry, it
aspires - in the style of Fathers 4 Justice - to a higher, louder
profile.
This is not good news for adoption professionals, who are uneasy about
Fassit's highly-charged, at times almost paranoid, take on children and
families policy, and the crudity of the invective it directs at social
workers. Its website portrays them as untouchable enforcers of social
engineering, eager to break up happy homes while failing to protect
children in real danger of abuse. Social services departments, it says,
have been "systematically kidnapping young children from heartbroken
families for no legal or proper reasons". Social workers, it says,
"procure" children for adoption.
Consider the following extract from the Fassit website: "If you yourself
have an unhappy or non-existent family life you are an ideal candidate
to become a social worker. When you get used to breaking up other
people's families and taking their children you will forget your own
troubles and it will make you feel great. Remember, however, that if you
come across a really brutal family where a child is being cruelly abused
(like Victoria Climbié), just clear out in a hurry and leave them alone.
Don't worry, no one will expect you to risk your own safety."
End Quote
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
Valid email ***@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
Part Quote
Upping the anti
A new Fathers 4 Justice-style campaign group has launched a series of
bitter attacks on social workers, calling them 'child snatchers' and
family wreckers. David Batty investigates
Read one social worker's reply
Wednesday October 5, 2005
The Guardian
The Daily Mail launched an impassioned broadside on adoption policy
recently - and turned to a tiny, virtually unknown campaign group to
help give credence to its claims that children were being unfairly taken
into care because their parents were too "slow" or too poor. Below the
paper's campaign slogan "Stolen by the State", the group's claims that
councils were being bribed by ministers to arrange more adoptions, and
that this led to children being "snatched" from their birth parents for
spurious reasons, were extensively quoted.
The group is the Families Anti Social Services Inquiry Team (Fassit).
Members share information on the web, and mainly consist of parents
under investigation by social services or in dispute with their
ex-partner over access to their children. But its prominent role in the
Mail's campaign has put wind in its sails. Committed and angry, it
aspires - in the style of Fathers 4 Justice - to a higher, louder
profile.
This is not good news for adoption professionals, who are uneasy about
Fassit's highly-charged, at times almost paranoid, take on children and
families policy, and the crudity of the invective it directs at social
workers. Its website portrays them as untouchable enforcers of social
engineering, eager to break up happy homes while failing to protect
children in real danger of abuse. Social services departments, it says,
have been "systematically kidnapping young children from heartbroken
families for no legal or proper reasons". Social workers, it says,
"procure" children for adoption.
Consider the following extract from the Fassit website: "If you yourself
have an unhappy or non-existent family life you are an ideal candidate
to become a social worker. When you get used to breaking up other
people's families and taking their children you will forget your own
troubles and it will make you feel great. Remember, however, that if you
come across a really brutal family where a child is being cruelly abused
(like Victoria Climbié), just clear out in a hurry and leave them alone.
Don't worry, no one will expect you to risk your own safety."
End Quote
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
Valid email ***@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG